Recently, Johnson & Johnson has been ordered by a jury to pay over $1 billion in damages because it was said that the company covered up flaws in its Pinnacle artificial hip products. The suit claims that the DePuy unit of the company knew about these defects but still chose not to warn doctors and patients about the inherent risks they could pose.
The company was ordered to pay $30 million in damages to six plaintiffs and over $1 billion in punitive damages, according to a report from the Chicago Tribune. Those who had the defective devices installed had to have them surgically removed. The company will likely appeal the decision, but University of Michigan law professor Erik Gordon says that company may want to start making settlement offers to the thousands of potential claimants across the country.
“They may think they have good defenses to these claims, but they don’t seem to be working with juries. There’s no easy way out of these cases now that they have a billion-dollar verdict against them. They better start thinking of how they can settle these claims before the price goes up any more,” he said.
It is indicated early on that the company will continue to defend its actions, as company spokesperson Mindy Tinsley released a statement saying that the DePuy unit had designed and tested the hip products more than appropriately.
Furthermore, the company says it has strong grounds for an appeal, alleging that Texas Judge Ed Kinkeade did not allow a “fair presentation to the jury.” In a statement, attorney John Beisner said that an appellate court would need to review the case for errors; representatives will be asking Judge Kinkeade to postpone scheduling any more trials until that review is conducted.
Regardless of the outcome, Johnson & Johnson will have long road of litigation ahead of it connected to the hip products. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission estimates that there are roughly 9,000 pending suits connected to Pinnacle hip failures, and a billion dollar settlement would set a grim tone going forward.
“The jury is telling J&J that they better settle these cases soon,” said John Lanier, who represented the six Texas claimants. “All they are doing by trying more of these cases is driving up their costs and driving the company’s reputation into the mud.”