Consumer Cellular Class Action; Alleges Fraudulent Pay Practices
Johnson Becker, PLLC are currently investigating Consumer Cellular’s pay practices for its Customer Service Representatives. In many cases, Customer Service Representatives are non-exempt employees owed overtime for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek. These hours include the amount of time it takes a Customer Service Representative to boot-up and log-in to their computers and work-related programs.
The U.S. Department of Labor released guidance to alert and condemn an employer’s non-payment of an employee’s necessary preliminary and postliminary activities. According to the DOL: “An example of the first principal activity of the day for agents/specialists/representatives working in call centers includes starting the computer to download work instructions, computer applications and work-related emails.” Moreover, the DOL went on to say that FLSA requires that “[a] daily or weekly record of all hours worked, including time spent in pre-shift and post-shift job-related activities must be kept.”
For the average call center, these initial principal activities generally include booting up a computer at the start of the workday to log into necessary work-related programs. Thus, time spent booting-up and logging-in to work-related programs is necessarily essential to the performance of a Customer Service Representative’s job and is compensable.
If you are a current or former employee of Consumer Cellular in Arizona or Oregon, and believe you are owed unpaid wages for boot-up and log-in time, please contact us immediately.
Editor’s note on the Consumer Cellular Pay Practices Class Action Lawsuit Investigation:
This piece is written about recent troubles with pay practices from Consumer Cellular. If you have gone through issues similar to what is covered above, we do ask that you contact us today! If you are considered eligible to be among the class of consumers described in the article above, you may eventually be able to participate in receiving any compensation the court may award.
If you believe that what is alleged in this piece has affected you, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us. We’d be happy to help you take a step in the right direction, fight this issue, and better enable you to join the consumer class action. If interested, please send an email to Outreach@ConsiderTheConsumer.com, find us on Twitter or Facebook, or even connect with us directly on our website! We look forward to hearing from you all.
Similarly, please check out our current list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Lawsuit Investigations, here.
Interested in articles like these? Become a subscriber below!
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements. Past results don’t guarantee future successes.
Counsel responsible for this advertisement is:
Johnson Becker, PLLC
444 Cedar Street, Suite 1800
St. Paul, MN 55101
PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB PAGE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEY(S) ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. Consider the Consumer is not a law firm, lawyer referral service, or prepaid legal services plan. We do not make any representation, and have not made any judgment, as to the qualifications, expertise, or credentials of any participating lawyer or processing group. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services or claims processing to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services or claims processing performed by other lawyers or claims processing group. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Consider the Consumer does not create an attorney-client relationship and might not be protected by attorney-client privilege. Instead, your information will be forwarded to an attorney or claims processing firm for the purpose of a confidential review and potential representation. You should not use this website to submit confidential, time-sensitive, or privileged information.