In August 2018, a class action lawsuit was filed against Clif Bar & Company for allegedly misleadingly marketing Clif Bar® White Chocolate Macadamia Nut bars and Luna® White Chocolate Macadamia bars as containing white chocolate when, according to the Clif Bar Class Action Lawsuit complaint, they…. do not? A full copy of the Clif Bar Lawsuit is below:
Per the complaint, “White Chocolate” signifies only one thing: a confection that contains cocoa butter, dairy ingredients, and a sweetener. Real white chocolate’s flavor is partially imparted by milkfat. Accordingly, U.S., Canadian, and European regulators all define white chocolate as having at least 3.5% milkfat. The imitation white chocolate in the products the Clif Bar lawsuit surrounds itself on do not have milkfat or any of the specified ingredients stated above, as required to define. Herein lies the plaintiff’s issue.
Editor’s note on the Clif Bar Class Action Lawsuit:
This piece is written about the recent Clif Bar Lawsuit. If you are considered eligible to be among the class of consumers described in the class action, you may eventually be able to participate in receiving any compensation the court may award.
If you believe that what is alleged in the Clif Bar class action has affected you, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us. We’d be happy to help you take a step in the right direction, fight this issue, and better enable you to join the consumer class action. If interested, please send an email to Outreach@ConsiderTheConsumer.com, find us on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, or even connect with us directly on our website! We look forward to hearing from all of you.
The case can be searched for under the name: Joslin et al v. Clif Bar & Company, Case No. 18-cv-4941, N. D. CA.