California Security Search Wage Violations
In California, many employees are required to go through security searches before their shifts begin or after their shifts end without pay. Illegal work practices can include searching employees’ bags, purses, backpacks, and personal devices after they clocked out to end their shift or before they clocked in. Pay practices like that can violate the law.
Under California law, “hours worked” is defined as “the time during which an employee is subject to the control of an employer, and includes all the time the employee is suffered or permitted to work, whether or not required to do so[.]” Recently, the California Supreme Court made clear in the case of Amanda Frlekin v. Apple, Inc., that companies are responsible for paying for each minute worked by their employees, which includes the time spent undergoing bag searches.
In California, many companies do not pay workers for the time spent in security lines or the time required to have bags and personal items searched. When workers are required to wait in security lines or bag check lines without pay, the workers could be entitled to additional compensation.
If you work for a company that requires you to wait in line for a security check or to wait while your personal items (bags, purses, backpacks etc.) are searched, you could be entitled to additional compensation.
Editor’s note on the California Security Search Wage Violation Class Action Lawsuit:
This piece is written about recent troubles with required Security Checks for employees in the state of California, and the missing wages that come with them. If you have gone through issues similar to what is covered above, we do ask that you contact us today! If you are considered eligible to be among the class of consumers described in the article above, you may eventually be able to participate in receiving any compensation the court may award.
If you believe that what is alleged in this piece has affected you, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us. We’d be happy to help you take a step in the right direction, fight this issue, and better enable you to join the consumer class action. If interested, please send an email to Outreach@ConsiderTheConsumer.com, find us on Twitter or Facebook, or even connect with us directly on our website! We look forward to hearing from you all.
Similarly, please check out our current list of Class Action Lawsuits and Class Action Lawsuit Investigations, here.
Interested in articles like these? Become a subscriber below!
The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements. Past results don’t guarantee future successes.
Counsel responsible for this advertisement is:
Hodges & Foty, LLP
4409 Montrose Blvd, Suite 200
Houston, TX 77006
PAID ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT: THIS WEB PAGE IS AN ADVERTISEMENT AND THE PARTICIPATING ATTORNEY(S) ARE INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY PAY AN ADVERTISING FEE. Consider the Consumer is not a law firm, lawyer referral service, or prepaid legal services plan. We do not make any representation, and have not made any judgment, as to the qualifications, expertise, or credentials of any participating lawyer or processing group. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services or claims processing to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services or claims processing performed by other lawyers or claims processing group. The information contained herein is not legal advice. Any information you submit to Consider the Consumer does not create an attorney-client relationship and might not be protected by attorney-client privilege. Instead, your information will be forwarded to an attorney or claims processing firm for the purpose of a confidential review and potential representation. You should not use this website to submit confidential, time-sensitive, or privileged information.